User Profile & Activity

Mike Shields Member

I'm really struggling with some of the database connectivity strategies.  Specifically after mocking up what I want the UI to look like further development seems convoluted whether Code First or Database first, etc.  Now I understand the Entity Framework is basically a bridge between presentation and data but insofar as it is largely wizard generated it does not seem easy to adapt to later changes on either level.  Moreover, I don't want to learn/use Linq when I am already proficient in SQL.

I realize this message is more complaints than questions but I REALLY do want to use Intersoft components except at the moment I'm instead thinking of backtracking not only out of Silverlight but also to the most basic ADO.NET training by Microsoft. 

Suggestions how I can get past this learning impass (I'm looking at DevForce now) would be much appreciated.

bump

I'm trying to build (something like) a facebook for business users.  A main aspect of it is searching through a database for other members.  However, most Silverlight tutorials etc focus on the front end and implement the back-end through a great deal of wizard/abstraction. 

Specifically, WCF RIA (data-first) assumes a pre-built database be used to generate an Entity Framework.  Yet then if change or additions are made to the database a new EF generation is required which may break existing abstracted code (though I believe DevForce tools ameliorate this somewhat). 

Yet building an app from scratch a "created first" database is likely to have many iterations.  Thus it seems preferable to build the front end first (using XML data resources as in Intersoft tutorials) and afterward devise/create the database and wire up the plumbing.

Alternatively Microsoft Lightswitch (beta) starts with prompting users to create a database table from which it then automatically abstracts a Silverlight templated front end.  This in theory then would quickly create the scaffolding for the app, around which the ClientUI components & modules could be "wired up".

Granted there are many opinions but insofar as I am still learning much of this any feedback/comments would be appreciated.   

Posted: April 15, 2011 6:37 PM

Any update on when 2011 R1 release date may be?

Also fyi the back button for your site seems to be broken for Firefox 4 (but not for IE9 or Chrome).  To replicate open FF4 and goto:

http://www.intersoftpt.com/Support/ClientUI/Documentation/ClientUIControls.html  then click any link such as

http://www.intersoftpt.com/Support/ClientUI/Documentation/ClientUIControls.html#url=ControlsbyAlphabet.html then click back button.

 

Thanks, I created the project and cut and pasted the code again and have a working app -- though for us complete noobs there imho should be at the end of the guides instruction on how to add the component to the UXPage1.xaml.  Another question though is:

The Intersoft ClientUI tools in the VS2010 panel do not appear in alphabetical order and have some listed as UX___ and some just as the component name.  What are the differences and why do they appear in the order they do (i.e. it makes finding the right control difficult at times).

 

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 2:37 AM.
Previous Next