Intersoft Community - ClientUI - UXMaskedInput

UXMaskedInput

rasmister — Wed, 16 Feb 2011 18:26:03 GMT

Jimmy, I found it.

My size of the control was Width="101" when I changed it to Width="110" it began to work.

Thanks

Ross

UXMaskedInput

jimmyps — Tue, 01 Feb 2011 23:43:39 GMT

Ross, thanks for the update.

We've tested the UXMaskedInput in a number of scenarios, including applying it in the Contacts application that use DevForce as data store. All worked fine so far.

It will be great if you can help to provide a small working example that replicates the issue.

UXMaskedInput

rasmister — Tue, 01 Feb 2011 16:56:56 GMT

Nope, still can't get it to work correctly.

UXMaskedInput

jimmyps — Sun, 23 Jan 2011 03:56:59 GMT

Hi Ross,

Any updates about the UXMaskedInput issue in your end?

Thanks,
Jimmy

UXMaskedInput

rasmister — Fri, 14 Jan 2011 10:21:27 GMT

Handy,

The point of the video was to prove that by switching between a UXMaskedInput then to a UXTextBox without changing anything else, that the binding is working. I will try something else until I can get it to work or fail and send you my results.

Ross

UXMaskedInput

handy@intersoftpt.com — Fri, 14 Jan 2011 02:14:21 GMT

Hello Ross,

Your video does not help much. We need to have the runable sample since we could not replicate the issue in here. I hope you understand. We need this to investigate the issue for you.

Regards,
Handy

UXMaskedInput

rasmister — Thu, 13 Jan 2011 23:53:00 GMT

Handy,

I will see what I can do, I may have to send the entire app to you which is huge. Its very hard to break it up with a sample that illustrates this problem. I really do believe that based on the video I sent that it is obvious that the textbox doesn't have an issue like the maskedinput, but, I understand, we are all developers here, and I have to prove something, which, if I can I will. Or maybe, you can show me the errors of my ways. :)

Take care,

Ross

UXMaskedInput

handy@intersoftpt.com — Thu, 13 Jan 2011 23:10:08 GMT

Hello Ross,

Unfortunately, We could not run your sample. Actually, we need to have the runable sample or at least we can know the real return value of your database.

E.g I used sample from ClientUI & DevForce Part 2: Contact Sandbox Editor .
In the phone field (EditContact), replace it with UXMaskedInput. When assigned value from database, it returns correctly.

Based on our discussion with developer teams, you need to check if the return value is correct or not.
Because if there is white space between or after the number, it will fail.

Regards,
Handy

UXMaskedInput

handy@intersoftpt.com — Thu, 13 Jan 2011 08:10:21 GMT

Hello Ross,

I need more time to investigate this scenario. I will let you know as soon as possible. Please bear with me.

Regards,
Handy

UXMaskedInput

rasmister — Wed, 12 Jan 2011 15:50:26 GMT

Jimmy,

It is not so simple to provide you with a sample, I tried it on the DF+IS ClientUI sample and it worked there, but for an odd reason it does work which I will explain...

In the sample app, the data is fetched before the Contact editor dialog is displayed, because of this, the binding in the Contact editor dialog works as expected. However, in my app, which you will see in the attached video, the data is not fetched until that window is opened. When it first displays, you will note that the field appears empty. I could either (a) click on the field and it would appear or do as I did in this video, minimize and restore. When it is restored, the data appears. So, the binding from MS SQL, EF, DF to IS is working as expected, however, the control is not responding correctly. Later in the video, I run a second time after changing the UXMaskedInput control to a UXTextBox control. When the window appears this time, the data is seen immediately. This proves it is not a binding problem witht the UXTextBox, so something is wrong with the UXMaskedInput binding architecture.

In the attachment is the xaml (highly commented out) and cs VM (highly commented out).

To create the table:
CREATE

TABLE [dbo].[ParticipantPhone](

[ParticipantPhoneID] [bigint] IDENTITY(0,1) NOT NULL,

[ParticipantID] [bigint] NOT NULL,

[HomePhone] [varchar](20) NULL,

[IsHomeSMS] [tinyint] NOT NULL,

[CellPhone] [varchar](20) NULL,

[IsCellSMS] [tinyint] NOT NULL,

[WorkPhone] [varchar](20) NULL,

[WorkExtension] [varchar](10) NULL, [IsWorkSMS] [tinyint] NOT NULL,

[OtherPhone] [varchar](20) NULL,

[IsOtherSMS] [tinyint] NOT NULL,

[Concurrency] [timestamp] NULL,

CONSTRAINT [PK_ParticipantPhone] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED

(

[ParticipantPhoneID] ASC

)WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON) ON [PRIMARY] ) ON [PRIMARY]

Insert 1 row into the table with a ParticipantID=1 and you should be able to reproduce the same problem.

I hope this helps?

Ross

UXMaskedInput

rasmister — Mon, 10 Jan 2011 16:11:39 GMT

Hello,

I have the following:

<Intersoft:FieldLabel Header="Home Phone" HeaderPosition="Top" HeaderForeground="White">

<Intersoft:UXMaskedInput x:Name="tbxHomePhone" Width="101" Value="{Binding CurrentParticipantPhone.HomePhone, Mode=TwoWay, NotifyOnValidationError=True}" EditMask="(###) ###-####" IsSaveLiteral="False" IsSaveMask="False" DisplayMode="EditMask" />

</Intersoft:FieldLabel>

I've tried the mask of (999) 000-0000 as well. No matter what I do, the bound value doesn't display until I click on the control. All I see is the EditMask itself. I've set DisplayMode to Value but that doesn't appear either. The value is coming from a string column in a database that is connected via IdeaBlade DevForce. The value in the database column is 5555551212 which should appear as (555) 555-1212.