﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0"><channel><title>Intersoft Community - Crosslight - User Management and Authentication</title><link>http://www.intersoftsolutions.com/Community/Crosslight/User-Management-and-Authentication/</link><description /><generator>http://www.intersoftsolutions.com</generator><language>en</language><copyright>Copyright 2002 - 2015 Intersoft Solutions Corp. All rights reserved.</copyright><ttl>60</ttl><item><title>User Management and Authentication</title><link>http://www.intersoftsolutions.com/Community/Crosslight/User-Management-and-Authentication/</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2015 07:52:22 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>kibork</dc:creator><category>Crosslight</category><description>Ty, I will try it.
BG</description></item><item><title>User Management and Authentication</title><link>http://www.intersoftsolutions.com/Community/Crosslight/User-Management-and-Authentication/</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2015 19:01:55 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>jtungol@silentpartnersoft.com</dc:creator><category>Crosslight</category><description>ASP.NET Identity 2.0 support would be great. I second&amp;nbsp; that.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>User Management and Authentication</title><link>http://www.intersoftsolutions.com/Community/Crosslight/User-Management-and-Authentication/</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2015 17:15:59 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>technical@intersoftpt.com</dc:creator><category>Crosslight</category><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello Max,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Yes, it is possible to use the table structure you mentioned with Crosslight's user management. In fact, Crosslight's service is designed to be very flexible and as data agnostic as possible, so you can use any kind of table structure in your apps. You just have to carefully remap the entities/properties in existing functions to your own entities/properties.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Since you're also using ASP.NET Identity (although newer version), it should be easier to adjust the current template to the referred table. Note that Crosslight's user management extends and customizes the original IdentityContext, so you should be able to map the required properties in OnModelCreating method of the particular entity context as well.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;On the other hand, we will also include an agenda in our roadmap for ASP.NET Identity 2.0 support.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hope this helps.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>User Management and Authentication</title><link>http://www.intersoftsolutions.com/Community/Crosslight/User-Management-and-Authentication/</link><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2015 13:32:16 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>kibork</dc:creator><category>Crosslight</category><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;is it possible to use&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://http://developer.intersoftpt.com/display/crosslight/User+Management+and+Authentication" target="_blank" style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;User Management and Authentication&lt;/a&gt;, when the structure of the tables is like on the picture. It is also ASP Identity, but it looks very different. Crosslight use the older version 1.0 right? I think the .edmx in the picture is from the newer version 2.x.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;BR&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>