﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0"><channel><title>Intersoft Community - WebCombo - WebCombo additional search columns</title><link>http://www.intersoftsolutions.com/Community/WebCombo/WebCombo-additional-search-columns/</link><description /><generator>http://www.intersoftsolutions.com</generator><language>en</language><copyright>Copyright 2002 - 2015 Intersoft Solutions Corp. All rights reserved.</copyright><ttl>60</ttl><item><title>WebCombo additional search columns</title><link>http://www.intersoftsolutions.com/Community/WebCombo/WebCombo-additional-search-columns/</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2015 16:42:37 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>dbar@diasfalisis.gr</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for your reply,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Nice workaround. But the fact remains: The component is not working correctly under all circumstances.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The problem is that in our project, the additional fields are not known during compile-time. Therefore a significant amount of work must be done to overcome this issue.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>WebCombo additional search columns</title><link>http://www.intersoftsolutions.com/Community/WebCombo/WebCombo-additional-search-columns/</link><pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2015 07:37:49 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>yudi</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="color: #1f497d;"&gt;I created a simple sample of WebCombo and get the same result. When string value is entered, it seems that filtering fail and all records are shown in the result box of WebCombo.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="color: #1f497d;"&gt;You may try to use requery approach. This approach allows developer to write their own code for manual data retrieving. I followed &lt;a href=""&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; knowledge base and modify the query text into the following: "Select TOP 15 * From Categories Where (CategoryName Like 'con%') OR (Description Like 'con%')".&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="color: #1f497d;"&gt;In your case you can use your own &lt;em&gt;Where&lt;/em&gt; clause by adding ID and ITEM field.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="color: #1f497d;"&gt;I enclose my simple sample as attachment. Hope this helps.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>WebCombo additional search columns</title><link>http://www.intersoftsolutions.com/Community/WebCombo/WebCombo-additional-search-columns/</link><pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2015 06:53:41 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>dbar@diasfalisis.gr</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;We are using WebCombo in out project integrated with WebGrid. We recently encountered an issue concerning the&amp;nbsp;AdditionalSearchFields.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;&lt;i&gt;Product Info: WebCombo 6.0.7200, WebGrid 9.0.7200&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;In our scenario, the&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;DataValueField and&amp;nbsp;DataTextField are set to the first column named ID which is of integer type and the&amp;nbsp;AdditionalSearchFields property points to a single field named ITEM which is nvarchar and the corresponding record values contain both integer and string values.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As long as numeric values are entered and searched, filtering works fine. All records containing the search value either on ID or on ITEMCODE are shown correctly. If a string value is entered that exists in column ITEM then it seems to fail to filter the rows and &lt;b&gt;ALL &lt;/b&gt;records are presented in the combo box list just as if not filter is entered.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I tried a test scenario in which the&amp;nbsp;DataValueField and the column(s) mentioned in&amp;nbsp;AdditionalSearchFields are all of string type and it works fine. The problem only appears when there is datatype inconsistency between as in my true scenario.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks in advance,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Dimitris&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>