﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0"><channel><title>Intersoft Community - ISDataSource - Hyperfast WebCombo using  ISLinqDataSource </title><link>http://www.intersoftsolutions.com/Community/ISDataSource/Hyperfast-WebCombo-using-ISLinqDataSource/</link><description /><generator>http://www.intersoftsolutions.com</generator><language>en</language><copyright>Copyright 2002 - 2015 Intersoft Solutions Corp. All rights reserved.</copyright><ttl>60</ttl><item><title>Hyperfast WebCombo using  ISLinqDataSource </title><link>http://www.intersoftsolutions.com/Community/ISDataSource/Hyperfast-WebCombo-using-ISLinqDataSource/</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 15:34:25 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>rvillela0@gmail.com</dc:creator><category>WebCombo</category><category>ISDataSource</category><description>&lt;p&gt;The sample indicates that "WebCombo.NET enables developer to bind millions of records without any performance loss" yet when I try to bind over 10,000 records, it salos way down. 100,000 records takes approximately 10 seconds for the page to load. Once loaded, it is Hyperfast! Are there some perfomance tips that I should be aware of? Would Load-on-Demand be a better option?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>